From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12742-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20246 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2003 15:26:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20230 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2003 15:26:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 24 Feb 2003 15:26:11 -0000
Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18nKUa-0000lX-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:26:08 -0500
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:26:00 -0000
To: uclinux-dev@uclinux.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdbserver relocation?
Message-ID: <20030224152608.GB2206@gnu.org>
References: <buok7fqqdzi.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <20030224142831.GB24793@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030224142831.GB24793@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Blat: Foop
From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00515.txt.bz2

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:28:31AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> You're wrong about referencing the m68k port though.  GDB's m68k/linux
> port (I assume that's what you meant) is for Linux, not uClinux.

Actually I was referring to the version of gdbserver that comes with the
uClinux distribution; that's rather hardwired for the m68k, and has certainly
been hacked on to some degree relative to the gdb version.

-Miles
-- 
We live, as we dream -- alone....