From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6121 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2003 21:49:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6114 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2003 21:49:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 22 Feb 2003 21:49:59 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 657F01BCAB; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:49:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 21:49:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: FW: Re: ser-pipe.c porting to MinGW Message-ID: <20030222214958.GA13119@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <9FF3133289A7A84E81E2ED8F5E56B379537CC6@sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com> <3E565EB1.9060504@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E565EB1.9060504@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00500.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:15:29PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: >>We have a stable MinGW port that works with remote SuperH targets which >>removes the need for cygwin to be installed on a win32 machine. I was >>unaware that this was an unsupported GDB platform so I guess we are on >>our own here. > >No, you just found yourself a job :-) Figure out what the changes >involve, see who owns them, and possibly get them merged in. In other words, do what I have suggested a couple of times in the MinGW mailing list... cgf