From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14787 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2003 17:32:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14773 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2003 17:32:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admin1.cvtt.net) (209.133.53.91) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 22 Feb 2003 17:32:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 31226 invoked by uid 89); 22 Feb 2003 17:26:27 -0000 Message-ID: <20030222172627.31225.qmail@admin1.cvtt.net> References: <20030220222419.21758.qmail@admin1.cvtt.net> <3E56F3A4.3000704@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3E56F3A4.3000704@redhat.com> From: mrcompiler@mrcompiler.com To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Multi-Arch symbol read warning message Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:32:00 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00498.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > >> I am building a multi-arch version of GDB for handling ELF format core >> files for the ARM and PowerPC processors running on vxWorks. In order to >> get everything to build I combined the information from > > Hmm, cute. This sort of sounds like I might using multi-arch in a different from intended ( or normal to date ). I did notice that most of the other stuff was supporting a single processor class across multiple OS environments. Is there any reason this shouldn't work? I also had an ambiguity problem with --enable-targets=all in bfd and had to specifically build those with --enable-targets=strongarm-coff, powerpc-elf, strongarm-elf ( possibly arm-elf, I don't have access to the build tree at this instant). > I posted a WIP patch for this several years ago but never got around to > integrating it (there wasn't sufficient immediate needed). Now that most > architectures are multi-arch, it is definitly time to integrate such a > change. You mean a patch for my symbol read warnings? Can you point me to it? > > Can you contribute this stuff? > Yes, I was planning on talking to you folks about this once I got it working. Obviously I don't want to make my first contribution a brain-damaged hack. Not that I'm necessary opposed to brain-damaged hacks as anyone who has downloaded my stuff from freshmeat can attest.... Gene