Re: [maint] The GDB maintenance process

Andrew Cagney
2003-02-19T23:52:17Z

>
>
> We've got two separate discussions here: The social conventions
> and procedures for how patches are discussed/applied, and the
> infrastructure to support those things.
>
> Using GNATS as the infrastructure to track patches is pathetic.

Not as pathetic as `cagney's mailbox sitting on a lapbrick with a
failing hard disk'.

> Using mailing lists to track patches is annoying.

Er, you can't track patches using a mailing list. A mailing list can be
used to submit/discuss patches. It can't be used to track their state.
that needs a database.

Time to install aegis, ay?

Andrew