From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21073 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2003 23:17:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21066 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2003 23:17:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO molenda.com) (192.220.74.81) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 19 Feb 2003 23:17:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 77144 invoked by uid 19025); 19 Feb 2003 23:17:09 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:17:00 -0000 From: Jason Molenda To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [maint] The GDB maintenance process Message-ID: <20030219151709.A75662@molenda.com> References: <20030217180709.GA19866@nevyn.them.org> <20030218042847.50F2E3CE5@localhost.redhat.com> <20030218023553.2BBB73D02@localhost.redhat.com> <15953.20132.193102.752916@localhost.redhat.com> <20030219014904.GA11446@nevyn.them.org> <3E539ABA.4050203@redhat.com> <1030219175720.ZM8839@localhost.localdomain> <3E53D47A.30809@redhat.com> <20030219203950.GA6639@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030219203950.GA6639@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:39:50PM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00384.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 02:01:14PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: >Red Hat makes sourceware available as a public service. It funds it >rather than owns it. The machine is adminstered by a group of overseers >(chrisf and jasonm are two). Minor correction - RH owns the physical sources.redhat.com system. It pays for the network bandwidth, electricity, and the necessary network IS resources. The time spent actually administering the box (almost entirely Chris Faylor these days) is outside the scope of cgf's Day Job, so most administration is on a volunteer basis. On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:39:50PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I know that Jason likes svn but I haven't used it. I'm not sure that it > would be easy to convince me to spend any time trying to convert > everything to a new source control system. CVS is nice because it lives > everywhere and is a known commodity. I don't think I saw anyone suggesting alternative SCMs... cagney wrote "sware, subversion, sourceforge", but he probably meant to write "subversions", as in "subversions.gnu.org". (svn is really interesting, and I expect I'll be playing with it more this year, but it'll be a while before anyone wants to switch their project to using it. If nothing else, each developer in that project has to install/set up svn before they can access the repository.) Jason