From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13446 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2003 02:39:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13415 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2003 02:39:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 18 Feb 2003 02:39:15 -0000 Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 1008) id 2BBB73D02; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:35:53 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [maint] The GDB maintenance process In-Reply-To: <20030217180709.GA19866@nevyn.them.org> "from Daniel Jacobowitz at Feb 17, 2003 01:07:09 pm" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 02:39:00 -0000 Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20030218023553.2BBB73D02@localhost.redhat.com> From: ac131313@redhat.com (Andrew Cagney) X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 > I've discussed this general situation with a (small) sampling of other GDB > developers and contributors - enough to know that I'm not alone in my > concerns. These aren't entirely my own words, either. I'll let other > people take credit/blame for them if they want to, and if I've represented > their opinions accurately. I recall you rasing this previously with me but I don't recall agreeing with your opinions (my concerns run along similar lines to what Elena posted). Normally political issues get discussed with the global maintainers (so that the mailing lists can focus on technical discussion). However, if you feel that it is better discussed here, then so be it. enjoy, Andrew