From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15189 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2003 17:27:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15182 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 17:27:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 17 Feb 2003 17:27:42 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18kqwV-0001uM-00; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:28:43 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18kp3K-00055Q-00; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:27:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Alex Bennee Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: What has replaced fork to launch external commands? Message-ID: <20030217172738.GA19524@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Bennee , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <1045500565.2505.20.camel@cambridge.braddahead> <20030217170013.GA18947@nevyn.them.org> <1045501672.2505.25.camel@cambridge.braddahead> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1045501672.2505.25.camel@cambridge.braddahead> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00275.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:07:52PM +0000, Alex Bennee wrote: > On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 17:00, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 04:49:25PM +0000, Alex Bennee wrote: > > Where'd you get this 20020211 GDB? I don't remember GDB ever having a > > "fork" command. > > >From ST's SH linux tools. Based on the original Monta Vista ones IIRC. I > guess they must of patched gdb. If I can check-out the 20020211 source > code from CVS I'll diff against the supplied sources and see what they > changed. > > It would help if I knew which branch it came from. If so I'm guessing it came from ST; MontaVista didn't add this command either. > > Meanwhile you can probably roughly use "shell" if I'm understanding > > what you're doing. > > Mmm, tried that but it ends up echoing gdb server stuff to the gdb > command line. Eh? An example, please? I guess it depends what the fork command is actually _doing_. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer