From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21252 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2003 16:50:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21245 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 16:50:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 17 Feb 2003 16:50:49 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18kqMq-0001pM-00 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:51:52 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18koTf-0004kc-00 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:50:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb 5.3 versus gdb HEAD%200302015 Message-ID: <20030217165047.GA18246@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200302171644.h1HGi3p12340@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302171644.h1HGi3p12340@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00264.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:44:03AM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > Nope, there was no PR, just a patch when I noticed it. Besides, didn't > > we want to only use PRs in the GDB database? This would be an > > external/closed. > > Works for me. Heck, I think I argued for that position anyways! > > Unfortunately gdb_mi_test does not have a multi-armed form so > I have to use a blunt setup_kfail. > > I'll go file an external/closed PR for this and then point the > test case at it. If you use a setup_kfail, won't it start showing up as a KPASS for all of us with fixed GCCs? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer