From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12489-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15566 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2003 16:44:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15545 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 16:44:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 17 Feb 2003 16:44:05 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1HGi3p12340;
	Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:44:03 -0600
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:44:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200302171644.h1HGi3p12340@duracef.shout.net>
To: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb 5.3 versus gdb HEAD%200302015
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00262.txt.bz2

> Nope, there was no PR, just a patch when I noticed it.  Besides, didn't
> we want to only use PRs in the GDB database?  This would be an
> external/closed.

Works for me.  Heck, I think I argued for that position anyways!

Unfortunately gdb_mi_test does not have a multi-armed form so
I have to use a blunt setup_kfail.

I'll go file an external/closed PR for this and then point the
test case at it.

Michael C