From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: frame_register_unwind(): "frame != NULL" assertion failure
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030214151451.GC30416@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E4D042F.3060102@redhat.com>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:58:55PM +0100, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Here's one possible "fix" for the assertion failure. I've come to the
> >conclusion that the real culprit is get_next_frame(), but, unfortunately,
> >the rest of gdb is not yet ready for it to return the sentinel frame.
> >(See the comment in the patch for more info.) So, until it is, I propose
> >that we use this hack...
> >
> > * frame.c (create_sentinel_frame): Make static. Add forward
> > declaration.
> > (frame_register_unwind): Add hack for converting NULL frames
> > into a sentinel frame.
>
> I think, if there is going to be a hac, then it should be in
> read_next_frame_reg().
>
> However, can you please first investigate modifying the start of
> mips_init_extra_frame_info() where it does:
>
> proc_desc = get_next_frame (fci) ? .....
>
> to, when get_next_frame(fci) is null, call:
>
> find_proc_desc (get_frame_pc (fci), fci, 1);
>
> that is the current, and not prev frame.
I'm pretty sure that won't work - we're initializing the saved regs for
fci right now, and find_proc_desc wants a frame to read registers out
of.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-14 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-13 21:24 Kevin Buettner
2003-02-13 21:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-13 21:35 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-13 21:48 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-13 23:27 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-14 14:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-14 15:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-02-14 15:24 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-17 15:37 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-17 23:21 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-18 2:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-18 1:59 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-18 22:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-20 16:18 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-02-20 16:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-20 16:36 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030214151451.GC30416@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox