Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: ac131313@redhat.com
Cc: mludvig@suse.cz, gdb@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] Re: regcache (Re: GDB respin)
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 23:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200302062324.h16NOABK027464@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E42A5F8.9080708@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 06 Feb 2003 13:14:16 -0500)

   Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 13:14:16 -0500
   From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>

   > diff -u -p -r1.33 -r1.34
   > --- gdb/x86-64-tdep.c   26 Oct 2002 10:37:45 -0000      1.33
   > +++ gdb/x86-64-tdep.c   26 Oct 2002 16:56:34 -0000      1.34
   > @@ -925,11 +925,35 @@ x86_64_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info inf
   > +  set_gdbarch_long_double_bit (gdbarch, 128);
   > +  set_gdbarch_ps_regnum (gdbarch, 17); /* %eflags */
   > +  set_gdbarch_stab_reg_to_regnum (gdbarch, x86_64_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum);
   > +  set_gdbarch_dwarf_reg_to_regnum (gdbarch, x86_64_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum);
   > +  set_gdbarch_extract_return_value (gdbarch, NULL);
   > +  set_gdbarch_store_return_value (gdbarch, NULL);
   > +  set_gdbarch_extract_struct_value_address (gdbarch, NULL);
   > 
   > If I comment out last three lines (those return_value related), the testsuite performs much better. But all the other lines seem have some influence on the results.

   Hmm, at least extract_return_value shouldn't be set to NULL.  It should 
   be doing:
	   extract-return-value()
	   -> legacy-extract-return-value()
	   -> deprecated-extract-return-value()
	   -> x86-64-extract-return-value
   So I'd at least remove the setting of that one.  Since it is trying to 
   restore the default, try setting it to legacy_...().  Same goes for 
   store_return_value.  I think extract_struct_value_address is puzzling 
   but ok.

Looks like I screwed up by assuming that setting things to NULL would
make us invoke the default.  Although I'd encourage Ludvig to make
these functions regcache aware, I checked in the attached patch.  I
think it would be a good idea to have things working correctly before
starting the conversion.

Mark

Index: ChangeLog
from  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>

	* x86-64-tdep.c (x86_64_init_abi): Set extract_return_value to
	legacy_extract_return_value and store_return_value to
	legacy_return_value.

Index: x86-64-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -p -r1.46 x86-64-tdep.c
--- x86-64-tdep.c 5 Jan 2003 14:07:03 -0000 1.46
+++ x86-64-tdep.c 6 Feb 2003 23:20:18 -0000
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ x86_64_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info inf
   set_gdbarch_read_fp (gdbarch, cfi_read_fp);
 
   /* FIXME: kettenis/20021026: Should be undeprecated.  */
-  set_gdbarch_extract_return_value (gdbarch, NULL);
+  set_gdbarch_extract_return_value (gdbarch, legacy_extract_return_value);
   set_gdbarch_deprecated_extract_return_value (gdbarch,
 					       x86_64_extract_return_value);
   set_gdbarch_push_arguments (gdbarch, x86_64_push_arguments);
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ x86_64_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info inf
   set_gdbarch_pop_frame (gdbarch, x86_64_pop_frame);
   set_gdbarch_store_struct_return (gdbarch, x86_64_store_struct_return);
   /* FIXME: kettenis/20021026: Should be undeprecated.  */
-  set_gdbarch_store_return_value (gdbarch, NULL);
+  set_gdbarch_store_return_value (gdbarch, legacy_store_return_value);
   set_gdbarch_deprecated_store_return_value (gdbarch,
 					     x86_64_store_return_value);
   /* Override, since this is handled by x86_64_extract_return_value.  */


  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-06 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-03 16:15 GDB respin Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-02-03 17:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-03 18:08   ` Elena Zannoni
2003-02-06 14:30   ` regcache (Re: GDB respin) Michal Ludvig
2003-02-06 18:14     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-06 23:24       ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2003-02-07 15:46       ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-09 10:20         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-10 21:26       ` Michal Ludvig
2003-02-10 22:42         ` Mark Kettenis
2003-02-11 16:31           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-11 23:12             ` Michal Ludvig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200302062324.h16NOABK027464@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org \
    --to=kettenis@chello.nl \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mludvig@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox