From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6370 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2003 21:41:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6363 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 21:41:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 21:41:05 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18gveb-0005I6-00 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 17:42:01 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18gtlX-0005Sv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 16:41:03 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 21:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb Subject: Re: gdb.c++/annota2.exp: annotate-quit Message-ID: <20030206214103.GA20993@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:39:23PM -0800, David Carlton wrote: > Sometime between yesterday and today, the test gdb.c++/annota2.exp, > which had been consistently KFAILing for me, started consistently > passing. Is anybody else seeing this? Does anybody currently see it > KFAIL? Is there any chance that the interpreter patch from yesterday > or today might have fixed this bug? (The bug has nothing to do with > C++ or annotations: it's just that GDB wasn't always responding to a > ^C as it should.) I see this also; but it's done this in the past, so I'm reluctant to claim that it's actually fixed. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer