From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12352-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 18329 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2003 14:36:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18321 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 14:36:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO white) (68.14.146.65)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 14:36:48 -0000
Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18gn8y-0001wD-00
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 09:36:48 -0500
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 14:36:00 -0000
From: Bob Rossi <bob_rossi@cox.net>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: gdb-mi, gdb-5.3 or cvs?
Message-ID: <20030206143647.GA7441@white>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2

I am trying to interface cgdb with gdb using gdb-mi.

Should I be using gdb-5.3 or the latest cvs? They act different.

Also, what is the best way to ask mi for the absolute path to the
current source file. This wasn't a problem using annotate 1 or 2, and I
can't figure out how to get it using mi.

Thanks for the help,
Bob Rossi