From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12345-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 19131 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2003 22:45:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 19123 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 22:45:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 5 Feb 2003 22:45:21 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h15MjLa11991
	for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:45:21 -0600
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 22:45:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200302052245.h15MjLa11991@duracef.shout.net>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Clean up gdb.c++ tests for dwarf 1
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2

I'm hearing a lot of support for option (1) so I will prepare a patch
and back it up with some test runs.  I did test DWARF 1 a year or two
ago and I'm kinda curious what it looks like now.

This will be an "everything on the Internet takes a week" patch because
someone might pop up with a DWARF 1 story that foils everything.

Michael C