From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12329-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28854 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2003 15:53:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28838 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 15:53:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 5 Feb 2003 15:53:52 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h15Frox04678;
	Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:53:50 -0600
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 15:53:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200302051553.h15Frox04678@duracef.shout.net>
To: ac131313@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Where to document supported versions of binutils?
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2

Andrew C enlightens me:
> gdb/PROBLEMS :-)

Doh!  As soon as I woke up this morning, I realized that!

Patch coming up.

As far as Eli's suggestion to make the configury warn about this:
it's interesting, but I'm going to pass on it.

Michael C