From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4215 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2003 16:27:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4208 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2003 16:27:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2003 16:27:15 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18fOqV-00048C-00; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:28:00 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18fMyA-0007A7-00; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 11:27:46 -0500 Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 16:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: Variables in blocks of registers Message-ID: <20030202162746.GA27502@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Mark Kettenis , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200302011448.h11EmCkP001176@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3E3BEC50.9040104@redhat.com> <20030201171001.GB29662@nevyn.them.org> <3E3C3200.8070803@redhat.com> <200302012235.h11MZ30D023842@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3E3D43E5.3060904@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E3D43E5.3060904@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 11:14:29AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > If only it were that easy. The dwarf2 reader, for instance, also > contains the assumption that registers are allocated sequentially. > > Is the proposal to modify such readers so that they check against this > next_allocated_regnum algorithm? Where? I can't find this; it doesn't even acknowledge multi-register values. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer