From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: Variables in blocks of registers
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 17:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030201171001.GB29662@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E3BEC50.9040104@redhat.com>
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 10:48:32AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On my i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 system, various tests in
> >gdb.base/store.exp fail. The reason is related to the problem
> >described in tdep/214; register variables that don't fit in a single
> >variable. GDB assumes that such variables are stored in consecutive
> >registers (according to its own register numbering scheme), which
> >defenitely isn't what GCC uses on the i386.
> >
> >I'm looking into the suggestion Daniel made in tdep/214; teaching GDB
> >about the order in which GCC allocates registers. There are several
> >caveats though:
> >
> >* While GCC allocates its registers in a particular order right now,
> > and always allocates blocks of consecutive registers, there is no
> > guarantee that it will continue to do so.
> >
> >* I have no idea what other compilers do. If GDB's register numbering
> > was chosen to match for example the System V compiler, teaching GDB
> > GCC's register ordering will cause regressions on system that use
> > it. We might play tricks with gcc_compiled of course.
> >
> >Since AFAIK GDB's internal register ordering is still not decoupled
> >from the remote interface, I propose to add a new multi-arch function
> >"next_regnum" which returns the next register to look in based on the
> >register number passed to it as an argument.
> >
> >Comments?
>
> dwarf2 makes it possible to scatter a value across both memory and
> registers. It's been proposed that the `struct value' be augmented with
> something like `struct location' that knows how to find any sub
> component of a value.
However, right now GCC doesn't generate this. Probably because it
would kill us. If I have any mental energy left after location lists,
I may implement support for DW_OP_piece.
Michael, I think the new multi-arch function is a good idea as long as
it is a fallback from explicit debug info support, when we have such.
I also think it needs a better name; but I'm not quite sure what. Hmm,
that could be mitigated by adequate commenting.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-01 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-01 14:48 Mark Kettenis
2003-02-01 15:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-01 17:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-02-01 20:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-02 16:13 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-02-02 5:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-02 16:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-02 16:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-04 2:31 ` Jim Blandy
2003-02-04 4:07 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-02-02 15:33 ` Daniel Berlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030201171001.GB29662@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox