From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28986 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 22:00:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28979 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 22:00:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.ACT-Europe.FR) (212.157.227.154) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 22:00:45 -0000 Received: by dublin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix, from userid 525) id B9CFE22A021; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 23:00:44 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:00:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: Jim Blandy Cc: Andrew Cagney , Nick Roberts , rms@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface Message-ID: <20030129230044.A29342@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> References: <15917.39229.935851.920452@nick.uklinux.net> <15927.12416.601404.240113@nick.uklinux.net> <3E376929.3060102@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jimb@redhat.com on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:52:27PM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00503.txt.bz2 > Well, gdb-ui provides a breakpoint window, a displays window, a local > variables window,etc. Level one just gives you enough to put an arrow > in the source code. If you look at DDD and GVD that both provide more than gdb-ui, you'll see that annotate 1 can be enough, although admitedly, things can be cumbersome some times. Arno