From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28478 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 16:01:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28471 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 16:01:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.ACT-Europe.FR) (212.157.227.154) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 16:01:02 -0000 Received: by dublin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix, from userid 525) id 6C3E022A020; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:01:01 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:01:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface Message-ID: <20030129170101.A9059@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> References: <20030128232906.B22772@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <3E3768D5.1060504@redhat.com> <20030129095458.B24931@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <3E37F0F2.7020506@redhat.com> <20030129163145.A4340@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <3E37F6B0.7000306@redhat.com> <20030129165106.A7279@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <20030129155602.GB10725@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20030129155602.GB10725@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:56:02AM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2 > And the missing features are...? I've stated them at least 3 times in this thread (which I assume is archived), but here there are again: - stability in the MI interface - ability to provide a user console with the CLI syntax Note that we haven't started implemented support for MI in GVD, so these are really the two obvious features. Others may appear when we start implementing the real support. What are the gdb front-ends currently using MI ? It would be interesting to see the state of these front-ends and the problems encountered. Arno