From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19677 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 15:51:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19669 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 15:51:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.ACT-Europe.FR) (212.157.227.154) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 15:51:08 -0000 Received: by dublin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix, from userid 525) id E2FF622A01F; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:51:06 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:51:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Arnaud Charlet , Jim Blandy , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface Message-ID: <20030129165106.A7279@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> References: <20030128232906.B22772@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <3E3768D5.1060504@redhat.com> <20030129095458.B24931@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <3E37F0F2.7020506@redhat.com> <20030129163145.A4340@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <3E37F6B0.7000306@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3E37F6B0.7000306@redhat.com>; from ac131313@redhat.com on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:43:44AM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00486.txt.bz2 > Honestly? No. MI has `kick ass' features sufficent to justify the move > now: Well fine, so we are in disagreement. Maybe the gdb GUI you've written does not have the same requirements than GVD has. I'm not saying MI does not have some added value compared to CLI, I'm just saying (and I'm not the only one) that there are some missing features in MI which are important enough to be taken into account. Arno