From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25893 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 15:55:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25885 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 15:55:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 15:55:39 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 8FFA71B569; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:56:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:55:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface Message-ID: <20030129155602.GB10725@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20030128232906.B22772@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <3E3768D5.1060504@redhat.com> <20030129095458.B24931@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <3E37F0F2.7020506@redhat.com> <20030129163145.A4340@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> <3E37F6B0.7000306@redhat.com> <20030129165106.A7279@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030129165106.A7279@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00487.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:51:06PM +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote: >>Honestly? No. MI has `kick ass' features sufficent to justify the >>move now: > >Well fine, so we are in disagreement. Maybe the gdb GUI you've written >does not have the same requirements than GVD has. > >I'm not saying MI does not have some added value compared to CLI, I'm >just saying (and I'm not the only one) that there are some missing >features in MI which are important enough to be taken into account. And the missing features are...?