From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-12157-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15627 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 03:56:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15619 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 03:56:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 03:56:24 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18dlDY-0006yR-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 23:57:00 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18djL5-0001Rq-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:56:39 -0500
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 03:56:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Sunil Alankar <sunil.alankar@coware.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug
Message-ID: <20030129035639.GA25779@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Sunil Alankar <sunil.alankar@coware.com>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <20030108173042.GA22279@nevyn.them.org> <IMEGIEBLGLIOEGOLAFIEMEOJCEAA.sunil.alankar@coware.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <IMEGIEBLGLIOEGOLAFIEMEOJCEAA.sunil.alankar@coware.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00472.txt.bz2

Sunil,

Try using "set language c++" before you try to set the breakpoint, and
let me know if that fixes it; I just built a Solaris GDB and verified
that it does for me.  This is a workaround for a real GDB bug and the
fix is still in progress; I hope it will be in 5.4.

On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:10:05AM -0800, Sunil Alankar wrote:
> Yes. GDB 5.1 sets break point on func() with the same binary/compiler. 5.2
> and 5.3 also work on Linux but have problems on Solaris.
> 
> --Sunil
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz [mailto:drow@mvista.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:31 AM
> To: Sunil Alankar
> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:07:04PM -0800, Sunil Alankar wrote:
> > //-------------------------------------------------------------
> > #include <systemc.h>
> >
> > SC_MODULE(top)
> > {
> >  public:
> >
> >     sc_in_clk iclk;
> >
> >     void func()
> >         {
> >             printf (".");
> >         }
> >
> >     SC_CTOR(top)
> >         {
> >             SC_METHOD(func);
> >             sensitive_pos << iclk;
> >             dont_initialize();
> >         }
> > };
> 
> 
> Func is an inline method.  Does gdb 5.1 really set a breakpoint on it?
> Using the exact same binary and compiler?  I find that pretty
> surprising, since there is no symbol for it anywhere; GDB's support for
> inline methods is pretty lousy right now.
> 
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
> 
> 

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer