From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15093 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2003 22:29:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15080 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2003 22:29:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.ACT-Europe.FR) (212.157.227.154) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 28 Jan 2003 22:29:07 -0000 Received: by dublin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix, from userid 525) id 702E0229ED9; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 23:29:06 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:29:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface Message-ID: <20030128232906.B22772@dublin.int.act-europe.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jimb@redhat.com on Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:59:41PM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00468.txt.bz2 As one of the GVD (see http://libre.act-europe.fr/gvd) developers, I confirm that to use the GDB/MI, we are waiting for a stabilized interface (amny things have changed til recently in MI), and the ability to support the command line interface for providing a regular gdb console. Without these two critical points addressed by MI, there is no way we can replace annotate 1 by MI. Arno