From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10968 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2003 05:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10961 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2003 05:03:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 23 Jan 2003 05:03:15 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0N53Dg10577; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 23:03:13 -0600 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 05:03:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200301230503.h0N53Dg10577@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Expect broken by new TCL import X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00397.txt.bz2 Daniel J writes: > This means existing build directories probably need to be cleaned > pretty thoroughly. The beauty of the new toplevel configury: it's as > simple as rm -rf expect, make all-expect. Now it works. Ah, that is a blind spot in my coverage, I build in virgin directories nearly all the time, so I don't find problams like this. Also I checkout "gdb" and "dejagnu" separately, not "gdb+dejagnu", so that's another set of code paths that never hit my test bed. Michael C