From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18003 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2003 20:40:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17968 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2003 20:40:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 21 Jan 2003 20:40:56 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0LKend11500; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:40:49 -0600 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 20:40:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200301212040.h0LKend11500@duracef.shout.net> To: carlton@math.stanford.edu Subject: Re: obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00366.txt.bz2 David C writes: > (I don't want to delete them from that file until the whole file is gone, > but I do want to reproduce the bugs in other files.) That's my preference too. Some day I'll be comparing gdb-5.3 to the gdb 5.4/6.0 release candidate, and this way makes the comparison either. > I think I have a patch around to reproduce the watchpoint bug in > gdb.base/watchpoint.exp; I'll polish that off and submit it. Sounds good, I'll have my test bed ready for it. I'll work on the infamous "annotate-quit" test. I suppose that belongs in gdb.base/interrupt.exp. Michael C