From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13440 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2003 20:18:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13432 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 20:18:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 20:18:38 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18Zepe-0000TU-00 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:19:22 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Zcwr-0003h9-00 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:18:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:18:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB `cannotfix' pr state, require PR with xfail `moving forward'. Message-ID: <20030117201841.GA14124@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200301171945.h0HJjD405622@duracef.shout.net> <20030117194646.GA13074@nevyn.them.org> <3E2863B3.6010207@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E2863B3.6010207@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00330.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 03:12:35PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >In that case I'd want "broken in all GCC's" to be open rather than > >suspended. Does this bother anyone? > > Yes, that bothers me, it would be wrong. The only time a PR is in the > open state is when no one has looked at it. As soon as someone looks at > the PR, it should be changed from open to some other state - analized, > suspended, closed, ... Substitute "a state other than suspended or closed". Better? Probably "analyzed". -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer