Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
To: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB `cannotfix' pr state, require PR with xfail `moving forward'.
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301172002.h0HK2vI06079@duracef.shout.net> (raw)

Daniel J writes:
> In that case I'd want "broken in all GCC's" to be open rather than
> suspended.  Does this bother anyone?

If "external" is a class, it's okay with me if some of them
are "open" and some of them are "suspended".

I wish the state was an indicator of who we are waiting for:

  open      -> waiting for gdb investigator
  analyzed  -> waiting for gdb patch-writer
  external  -> waiting for external issue to be fixed
  suspended -> waiting for some miscellaneous condition
  feedback  -> waiting for original user
  closed    -> not waiting

But since we're headed for 'external' as a class rather than a state,
this isn't going to happen.

Michael C


             reply	other threads:[~2003-01-17 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-17 20:03 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-17 20:52 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 20:28 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-18 11:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-01-17 19:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 19:45 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 19:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 20:12   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 20:18     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 20:53       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 22:06         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 23:28           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-18  3:40             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 20:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 19:35 Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 19:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 19:29   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 19:47     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 19:40   ` David Carlton
2003-01-17 19:56 ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200301172002.h0HK2vI06079@duracef.shout.net \
    --to=mec@shout.net \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox