From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22037 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2003 17:36:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22010 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2003 17:36:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2003 17:36:46 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0EHaX105244; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:36:33 -0600 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:36:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200301141736.h0EHaX105244@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: A testsuite update, for the curious X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 Hi Daniel, We're in danger here of doing partial analysis on a lot of bugs and not finishing any of them. Well, okay, I'm in that danger. You get a lot of stuff committed. :) > It is dependent (like the rest of gdb.gdb/) on the compiler used to > build gdb and the optimization level. Do you use 2.95.3 + > optimization to build any of your GDB's? I don't control any optimization dimension, so all my tests are at default optimization. So that explains why you see stuff in complaints.exp and I don't see it. I do test with many gcc's including gcc 2.95.3. I could really use a big home cluster! Michael C