From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 22986 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2003 03:42:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 11 Jan 2003 03:42:19 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18XEPn-0005tV-00; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 23:42:40 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18XCXS-0001AU-00; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:42:26 -0500 Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 03:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: carlton@math.stanford.edu, shebs@apple.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: how canonical are template names? Message-ID: <20030111034226.GA4448@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , carlton@math.stanford.edu, shebs@apple.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200301110106.h0B16rd31712@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200301110106.h0B16rd31712@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00191.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 07:06:53PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > Since a C++ parser is a bitch of a thing to write, is there any chance > that Mark Mitchell's new C++ parser can be re-used in gdb? > > The interesting part would be doing name resolution out of the > symbol table information rather than internal compiler information. This is something that I _definitely_ intend to pursue. In order to do it we'd have to find a way to add the flexibility GDB needs without impacting the performance of the C++ parser.... Of course, for this to become a reality is sorta way down my list; it'll require some fundamental architecturing we don't have. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer