From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mec@shout.net>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Received: (qmail 17006 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2003 01:07:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 11 Jan 2003 01:07:07 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0B16rd31712;
	Fri, 10 Jan 2003 19:06:53 -0600
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:07:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200301110106.h0B16rd31712@duracef.shout.net>
To: carlton@math.stanford.edu, shebs@apple.com
Subject: Re: how canonical are template names?
Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2

Since a C++ parser is a bitch of a thing to write, is there any chance
that Mark Mitchell's new C++ parser can be re-used in gdb?

The interesting part would be doing name resolution out of the
symbol table information rather than internal compiler information.

Michael C