From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 28598 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2003 19:00:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2003 19:00:11 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18Wjn3-0002Ty-00 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 15:00:37 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Whug-0008J6-00 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 14:00:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Much of remote-utils obsolete now? Message-ID: <20030109190022.GA31708@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20020830211711.GA19488@nevyn.them.org> <3D763421.2050701@apple.com> <20020904162918.GA4532@nevyn.them.org> <3D763FE7.7080706@ges.redhat.com> <20020904174431.GA9914@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020904174431.GA9914@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:44:31PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:16:23PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 09:26:09AM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote: > > > > > >>Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >> > > > > > >>>remote-utils.[ch] claim to be generic support functions, but except for > > >>>some > > >>>stray calls in remote-array.c which could be easily removed, all the > > >>>references were in the now-obsolete remote-bug.c module. I'd like to see > > >>>this code die too, especially the undocumented and pretty much useless > > >>>"remote" command. > > >>> > > > > > >>remote-utils was obsolete several years ago, and I bet not one single > > >>person has used > > >>remote-array in five years at least. > > > > > > > > >Well, then :) Andrew, sounds like we have some more obsoletion > > >candidates. > > > > Yep. My obsolete queue has maxed out though (until after 5.3 has been > > released and I've zapped any of the current stuff). > > > > Perhaphs bug report it so that someone remembers to ``accidently > > deleted'' when the i960 stuff goes in ~2 months. > > Check. It's gdb/685. Hey, Andrew... should we //OBSOLETE or just ``accidentally delete'' these? I'm open for either. That's remote-utils.[ch] and remote-array.c. Incidentally, mon960-rom.o can be removed now; nothing left references it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer