From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-11766-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25718 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2003 17:30:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25604 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2003 17:30:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 8 Jan 2003 17:30:48 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18WLum-0008U4-00; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:31:00 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18WK2M-0006w3-00; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:30:42 -0500
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 17:30:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Sunil Alankar <sunil.alankar@coware.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug
Message-ID: <20030108173042.GA22279@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Sunil Alankar <sunil.alankar@coware.com>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <IMEGIEBLGLIOEGOLAFIEGELNCEAA.sunil.alankar@coware.com> <IMEGIEBLGLIOEGOLAFIEIELOCEAA.sunil.alankar@coware.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <IMEGIEBLGLIOEGOLAFIEIELOCEAA.sunil.alankar@coware.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2

On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:07:04PM -0800, Sunil Alankar wrote:
> //-------------------------------------------------------------
> #include <systemc.h>
> 
> SC_MODULE(top)
> {
>  public:
> 
>     sc_in_clk iclk;
> 
>     void func()
>         {
>             printf (".");
>         }
> 
>     SC_CTOR(top)
>         {
>             SC_METHOD(func);
>             sensitive_pos << iclk;
>             dont_initialize();
>         }
> };


Func is an inline method.  Does gdb 5.1 really set a breakpoint on it? 
Using the exact same binary and compiler?  I find that pretty
surprising, since there is no symbol for it anywhere; GDB's support for
inline methods is pretty lousy right now.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer