From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16732 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2003 18:02:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16674 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2003 18:02:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 4 Jan 2003 18:02:54 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h04I2fd02865; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 12:02:41 -0600 Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 18:02:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200301041802.h04I2fd02865@duracef.shout.net> To: drow@mvista.com Subject: Re: Replace TYPE_FLAG_PROTOTYPED with two flags Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 Wow, Daniel! My observation with stabs+ matches yours: gcc does not emit a prototype, but it does correctly mark the formal argument with 'float' or 'double'. This ought to get a lot more cases correct, with provisions for more kludges^H^H^H^H^H^H^H extensions if strange compilers show up. I do think it's a bit of hack for the stabs reader to claim that all functions are prototyped. I think TYPE_FLAG_PROTO_KNOWN would be more accurate. But it's not like new broken compilers are showing up all the time (I hope). Someday, it will all be dwarf-2. Michael C