From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28454 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 17:29:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28374 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 17:29:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (80.14.53.214) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 17:29:54 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 00665D34AE; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:29:39 +0400 (RET) Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:29:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 5.3.1 vs 5.4/6.0 Message-ID: <20030102172939.GD693@gnat.com> References: <3E145BA0.4050403@redhat.com> <20030102154116.GC693@gnat.com> <3E1473CA.8070401@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E1473CA.8070401@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 > MichaelC in his last summary mentioned that no one had committed > anything to the branch? Ah, sorry. I thought I had seen some checkins that went in the 5.3 branch after the 5.3 release, but double checking with the gdb ChangeLog, I see that I was wrong. Sorry about that. -- Joel