Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
To: ac131313@redhat.com, brobecker@gnat.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 5.3.1 vs 5.4/6.0
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301021719.h02HJWu28192@duracef.shout.net> (raw)

Joel Brobecker writes:
> I think we have enough valuable fixes in the 5.3 branch to make a 5.3.1
> release worth-while.

Huh?  Every one of the valuable fixes are already in the gdb 5.3 release.
There's nothing more to release.  I mean that literally.  The only change
since the release is the version number bump to 5.3.0.90.

Are you saying that the 5.3 release has a lot of fixes that need to be
forward-ported to HEAD, or what?

Michael C

  % cvs diff -r gdb_5_3-12-12-release -r gdb_5_3-branch
  Index: gdb/ChangeLog
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/ChangeLog,v
  retrieving revision 1.3181.2.54
  retrieving revision 1.3181.2.55
  diff -r1.3181.2.54 -r1.3181.2.55
  0a1,4
  > 2002-12-11  GDB Administrator  <gdbadmin@sourceware.org>
  >
  >       * version.in: Bump to version 5.3.0.90.
  >
  Index: gdb/version.in
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/version.in,v
  retrieving revision 1.447.2.104
  retrieving revision 1.447.2.127
  diff -r1.447.2.104 -r1.447.2.127
  1c1
  < 5.3
  ---
  > 5.3.0.90_2003-01-02-cvs


             reply	other threads:[~2003-01-02 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-02 17:19 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-02 17:22 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-02 15:33 Andrew Cagney
2003-01-02 15:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2003-01-02 17:16   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-02 17:29     ` Joel Brobecker
2003-01-02 18:55       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-02 17:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-02 19:01   ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200301021719.h02HJWu28192@duracef.shout.net \
    --to=mec@shout.net \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox