From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13911 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 15:41:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13901 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 15:41:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (80.14.53.214) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 15:41:32 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id E2AFCD34AE; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:41:16 +0400 (RET) Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 15:41:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 5.3.1 vs 5.4/6.0 Message-ID: <20030102154116.GC693@gnat.com> References: <3E145BA0.4050403@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E145BA0.4050403@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 > Still, the question is: should the next release be 5.3.1, or 5.4/6.0? > > 5.3.1 would be something like end Jan / start Feb. > 5.4/6.0 branch would be ~March. I think we have enough valuable fixes in the 5.3 branch to make a 5.3.1 release worth-while. > (As for 5.4 vs 6.0, I don't think the multi-arch goal will have been > achieved.) Apart from HP/UX (my bad, sorry sorry sorry, I've been sooo busy, I didn't even take a christmas break), which platforms still need to be converted before we can go to 6.0? -- Joel