From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 904 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2002 21:34:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 895 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2002 21:34:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hug.dreamhost.com) (66.33.197.18) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 28 Dec 2002 21:34:10 -0000 Received: from paper-wolf-solo.tigerfood.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hug.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7E117EAD for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 13:33:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from tigerfood.org (flee@localhost) by paper-wolf-solo.tigerfood.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBSLX2m08039 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 13:33:03 -0800 Message-Id: <200212282133.gBSLX2m08039@paper-wolf-solo.tigerfood.org> X-Authentication-Warning: paper-wolf-solo.tigerfood.org: flee owned process doing -bs From: Felix Lee Subject: Re: gnu.gdb.bug To: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200212282036.gBSKa4m03227@duracef.shout.net> on Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:36:04 CST. Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 13:34:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00330.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain : > Occasionally there is a legitimate message on gnu.gdb.bug, > but it's about 90% spam these days. yeah, so is there any reason for it to stay around? how about just delete it, or delete mentions of it? --