From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22541 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2002 04:16:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22524 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2002 04:16:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout6-0.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.177) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 28 Dec 2002 04:16:12 -0000 Received: from doctormoo (syr-24-24-16-193.twcny.rr.com [24.24.16.193]) by mailout6-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/RoadRunner 1.20) with ESMTP id gBS4Fxk07987; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:15:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18S8N1-0000pl-00; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:14:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:16:00 -0000 To: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Cc: dje@transmeta.com Subject: Re: ^c now disallowed? (was Re: "cd dir && $(MAKE)", not "cd dir; $(MAKE)") Message-ID: <20021228041443.GA3199@doctormoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Nathanael Nerode X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 >> To me there are legitimate reasons why a developer would want >> "make ; ^c ; make" to work. > >I agree. > >> If by "key files" you mean "the target of the rule" I _think_ we're >ok. > >I'm thinking that some rules might alter non-target files (like >config.cache for configure), which might cause problems. If you didn't interrupt a subconfigure pass, you should be fine. If you did, you should delete the appropriate config.cache, the appropriate Makefile, and anything else generated or modified by that 'configure', and then you should be fine. At least that's my belief. --Nathanael