From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-11663-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16060 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2002 20:46:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16013 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2002 20:46:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO delorie.com) (207.22.48.162)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2002 20:46:50 -0000
Received: from envy.delorie.com (envy.delorie.com [207.22.48.171])
	by delorie.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id gBRKkcq11483;
	Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:46:38 -0500
Received: (from dj@localhost)
	by envy.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) id gBRKkb226510;
	Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:46:38 -0500
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:46:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200212272046.gBRKkb226510@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj@delorie.com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com>
To: dje@transmeta.com
CC: neroden@twcny.rr.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <15884.47902.892560.313412@casey.transmeta.com> (message from
	Doug Evans on Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:42:06 -0800 (PST))
Subject: Re: ^c now disallowed? (was Re: "cd dir && $(MAKE)", not "cd dir; $(MAKE)")
References: <200212271914.LAA04845@casey.transmeta.com>
	<200212271947.gBRJlK125992@envy.delorie.com> <15884.47902.892560.313412@casey.transmeta.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00322.txt.bz2


> To me there are legitimate reasons why a developer would want
> "make ; ^c ; make" to work.

I agree.

> If by "key files" you mean "the target of the rule" I _think_ we're ok.

I'm thinking that some rules might alter non-target files (like
config.cache for configure), which might cause problems.