From: DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com>
To: dje@transmeta.com
Cc: neroden@twcny.rr.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: ^c now disallowed? (was Re: "cd dir && $(MAKE)", not "cd dir; $(MAKE)")
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 11:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212271947.gBRJlK125992@envy.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200212271914.LAA04845@casey.transmeta.com> (message from Doug Evans on Fri, 27 Dec 2002 11:14:42 -0800)
> Ugh. This is an effect of the configury change that
> I hadn't anticipated. This is going to be a major pain IMHO.
>
> Are the powers that be really ok with saying "just don't do that (*1)" ?
I don't think this is really new - hitting ^C in the middle of a
configure before may have left you unreliable too, and target
configures were done during the build before.
I think a better solution to support is documenting how to do a
partial configure/build without needing the ctrl-c. So that you'd
just say "make all-this all-that" and know that it's doing the right
minimal set of rules.
I would be amenable to altering the makefiles to delete key files on
failure, to ensure they get rebuilt the next time around. But a
ctrl-c interrupt would skip that step as well, so I don't see how we
could do that reliably. The best we can do is keep the window of
misopportunity limited creating the key files only as the last step.
I.e, move in place after complete rather than redirect to the final
file. Autoconf already works mostly this way.
The only way we could claim ctrl-c was reliable was is make itself
deleted the key files if that rule is interrupted. I don't think we
can rely on that being portable, but at least we could claim that for
makes that support that, we claim that it works reliably.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-27 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-27 11:16 Doug Evans
2002-12-27 11:47 ` DJ Delorie [this message]
2002-12-27 12:42 ` Doug Evans
2002-12-27 12:46 ` DJ Delorie
2002-12-27 20:16 Nathanael Nerode
2003-01-02 14:56 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-02 17:28 ` Geoff Keating
2003-01-02 20:10 ` Alexandre Oliva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212271947.gBRJlK125992@envy.delorie.com \
--to=dj@delorie.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=dje@transmeta.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=neroden@twcny.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox