From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28823 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2002 01:58:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28744 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 01:58:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 01:58:10 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18KW6c-0002FS-00; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 21:58:18 -0600 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18KUEp-0005yf-00; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 20:58:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 17:58:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: carlton@math.stanford.edu, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Namespaces with gcc v3 stabs+? Message-ID: <20021207015838.GA22962@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , carlton@math.stanford.edu, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200212062105.gB6L5sH05223@duracef.shout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200212062105.gB6L5sH05223@duracef.shout.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:05:54PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > David Carlton writes: > > So for now I'd lean towards getting GCC to emit stabs+ info as it did > > in 2.95.3: that should be cheap on everybody's part, and profitable > > enough. > > Sounds good to me. If that's okay with drow, then that's what I'll > request in the bug report. Give me a couple of days? I want to spend a little time hacking on the debug info stuff - I'll try to get to it Monday. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer