From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2034 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2002 16:58:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2016 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2002 16:58:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO serdis.dis.ulpgc.es) (193.145.145.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2002 16:58:37 -0000 Received: from siglo21.dis.ulpgc.es (IDENT:root@siglo21.dis.ulpgc.es [193.145.145.16]) by serdis.dis.ulpgc.es (8.10.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id gB6H897130129 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 17:08:09 GMT Received: (from nobody@localhost) by siglo21.dis.ulpgc.es (8.11.6/8.9.3) id gB6Htu606431; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 17:55:56 GMT Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 08:58:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200212061755.gB6Htu606431@siglo21.dis.ulpgc.es> X-Authentication-Warning: siglo21.dis.ulpgc.es: nobody set sender to a2782@dis.ulpgc.es using -f From: a2782@dis.ulpgc.es To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: a2782@dis.ulpgc.es References: <200212041644.gB4GigY20676@duracef.shout.net> <200212042225.gB4MPEq04369@siglo21.dis.ulpgc.es> <02Dec5.103736pst.119043@gateway.apogee.com> In-Reply-To: <02Dec5.103736pst.119043@gateway.apogee.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP3 Imap webMail Program 2.0.11 Subject: Re: Pipe question (mmm) X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 That\'s a good idea, Stanley. I have thought about it, but I didn\'t know the command. Mensaje citado por: Stanley Gambarin : > it is unlikely that sending \\\"quit\\\\n\\\" down to GDB will work, > since it will take some time for GDB to reply to \'quit\' command. > The solution that work for me (in a very similar situation), is to > issue following commands: > > > set confirm off > > quit > > The \'confirm\' command is used to confirm dangerous operations; > disabling it will tell GDB to just go ahead and quit (killing inferior, if > there is one present). > > Hope that helps, > > -- stanley > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 2:25 PM > Subject: Re: Pipe question (mmm) > > > > Thanks again to Eli (I have removed the bug of strcat and the constant > > string) and Michael C for their effort. > > > > It\\\'s important to realize that gdb asks to confirm in several points of > > its execution (I will consider it from now). But I was using a very > > short code and this prompt didn\\\'t appear (and, as I said, GDB is ending > > properly). I wonder if it can be a problem with my development GUI > > (Kylix 3.0 Open Edition) or something I may be missing. Well, if anyone > > knows something new, don\\\'t hesitate to help me! > > > > Ciao! > > >