Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Namespaces with gcc v3 stabs+?
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 16:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212060031.gB60Vt517871@duracef.shout.net> (raw)

Question for Daniel J or David C or Kevin B or anybody who knows
about v3 and stabs support ...

I'm looking at disimprovements from gcc v2 to gcc v3.  One of the
issues is that gcc 2.95.3 / stabs+ emits stab information
for symbols in namespaces, but gcc 3.2.1 / stabs+ emits the stab
information with the wrong name.

Here is a test program:

  namespace AAA
  {
    char mychar;
  }

Here is the output with gcc 2.95.3:

  # gcc 2.95.3, -gstabs+, native i686-pc-linux-gnu
  .stabs "_3AAA.mychar:G(0,2)",32,0,3,0
  .globl _3AAA.mychar
  .bss
	  .type    _3AAA.mychar,@object
	  .size    _3AAA.mychar,1
  _3AAA.mychar:
	  .zero   1

And here is the output with gcc 3.2.1:

  # gcc 3.2.1, -gstabs+, native i686-pc-linux-gnu
  .globl _ZN3AAA6mycharE
	  .bss
	  .type   _ZN3AAA6mycharE,@object
	  .size   _ZN3AAA6mycharE,1
  _ZN3AAA6mycharE:
	  .zero   1
	  .stabs  "mychar:G(0,2)",32,0,3,0

Notice how the stab refers to "mychar", not "_ZN3AAA6mycharE".

The output is similar with gcc 3.0.4, gcc 3.1, gcc 3.1.1, gcc 3.2,
and gcc HEAD%20021203.

Is this ringing any bells?

Kevin B had a similar issue in May 2002:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-11/msg01661.html

I would like to file a bug report against gcc, and then change
the test script gdb.c++/namespace.exp to XFAIL the test with
stabs+ format and v3 (or later) compilers.

Michael C


             reply	other threads:[~2002-12-06  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-05 16:31 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
2002-12-05 17:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-06 11:25   ` David Carlton
2002-12-05 18:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-12-06 13:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-12-06 17:27 ` David Carlton
2002-12-07  6:49   ` Stan Shebs
2002-12-09 10:59     ` David Carlton
2002-12-06 17:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-06 19:48 Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200212060031.gB60Vt517871@duracef.shout.net \
    --to=mec@shout.net \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox