From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-11433-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17246 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2002 21:42:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17196 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 21:42:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 21:42:23 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18K5dl-0002Mp-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 17:42:45 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18K3lj-0005Q2-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 16:42:51 -0500
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 13:42:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: store.exp failures
Message-ID: <20021205214251.GA20762@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>,
	gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
References: <ro1wumo2lwx.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ro1wumo2lwx.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2

On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:30:54PM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> When I run gdb.base/store.exp, (GCC 3.1, i686 Linux) I get tons and
> tons of failures.  Looking into the log file, I see the following:
> 
> (gdb) break main
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x80488f0: file gdb.base/store.c, line 233.
> (gdb) run 
> Starting program: /extra/gdb/mirror/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/store 
> 
> Breakpoint 1, main () at gdb.base/store.c:233
> 233	  wack_struct_1 ();
> (gdb) tbreak wack_char
> Breakpoint 2 at 0x804849e: file gdb.base/store.c, line 46.
> (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/store.exp: tbreak wack_char
> continue
> Continuing.
> 
> Program exited normally.
> 
> So, basically, it looks like some of the calls to the wack_XXX
> functions are getting optimized out by the compiler, even though no
> optimization flags are being passed.  Digging into the assembly
> confirms this; the code for main starts off as follows:

Make the function non-static and it should work as expected...


-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer