From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19361 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2002 03:12:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19349 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 03:12:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO saturn.billgatliff.com) (209.251.101.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 03:12:16 -0000 Received: by saturn.billgatliff.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E9ED24E0124; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 21:15:35 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 19:12:00 -0000 From: "William A. Gatliff" To: Elena Zannoni Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb-5.2.1 loses command line Message-ID: <20021204211535.C31284@saturn.billgatliff.com> Reply-To: bgat@billgatliff.com References: <20021204204915.B31284@saturn.billgatliff.com> <15854.49047.135664.970802@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <15854.49047.135664.970802@localhost.redhat.com>; from ezannoni@redhat.com on Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:53:11PM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 Elena: On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:53:11PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote: > William A. Gatliff writes: > > Guys: > > > > > > Hmmm this smells like async/event loop/signal handling problems. Can > you try the same but after starting the debugger with --noasync? (if > the --noasync is still there, that is... and if the noasync code > hasn't bitrotted) It appears to still be there, and it appears to have no affect. b.g. -- Bill Gatliff I'm an embedded GNU developer first, GNU instructor second. http://billgatliff.com