From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-11418-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 13750 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2002 18:20:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 13736 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 18:20:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 18:20:14 -0000
Received: (from mec@localhost)
	by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gB4IK7522295;
	Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:20:07 -0600
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 10:20:00 -0000
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Message-Id: <200212041820.gB4IK7522295@duracef.shout.net>
To: drow@mvista.com
Subject: Re: Another "ptype B" validity question
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2

mec> . If gdb does print the "A;" member, is that acceptable or not?
mec>   Note that this is a slightly different question!

drow> It is _not_ acceptable.  I thought I'd gotten most of these but
drow> obviously I've missed some.  Please do file a bug.

Gotcha, pr gdb/869, ""ptype class B" fails with 3.3-ish gcc, stabs.".  I
attached a tarball with the test executable in it (among other things) so you
can get right to the nitty gritty.

Michael C