From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-11410-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22623 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2002 03:43:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22612 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 03:43:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 03:43:35 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18JSKF-0006gD-00; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 23:43:59 -0600
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18JQSC-000563-00; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 22:44:04 -0500
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 19:43:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Jafa <jafa@silicondust.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: recent changes to frame pointer handling on trunk?
Message-ID: <20021204034404.GA19574@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>,
	Jafa <jafa@silicondust.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
References: <039901c29b42$78f38fd0$f601a8c0@nkelseyxp> <3DED783E.4050601@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3DED783E.4050601@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:36:30PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Hi guys,
> >
> >
> >
> >I am working from the gdb trunk and the ip2k port of gdb.
> 
> (unless I'm missing something) GDB does not include a port to the ip2k.
> Suggest contacting who ever supplied you with this GDB.

<translation>

He's the one writing the ip2k port, I believe...

> >I have been running a trunk snapshot from about 4 weeks ago and when asked
> >for the frame-pointer I go and figure it out (the fp isn't normally stored
> >by the c-compiler).
> >
> >
> >
> >I just updated to the trunk and now the frames are all wrong.
> >
> >
> >
> >What I am seeing is that my code figures the FP out correctly (for example
> >SP+10) but instead of looking for the first parameter at FP+0, it looks for
> >the first parameter at FP+10.
> >
> >
> >
> >Does this make any sense to anyone?
> >
> >
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >Nick
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer