Re: SIG32/SIGTRAP issues

["H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:43:25PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:30:51PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:24:57PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:56:20PM -0500, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I seem to be running into a bit of an odd problem. When I have a
> > > > threaded application thats shared, everything works fine .. in the event
> > > > that the application is statically linked however, gdb gets a SIG32 at
> > > > pthread_create() time and doesn't track the threads properly.
> > > 
> > > Funny, no one reports this for months and this is the third report I've
> > > seen in a week...  At the bottom of this message is a workaround.  I'm
> > > not proposing it be committed, since it's obviously pretty gross.  The
> > > real issue is the concept of thread_stratum and core_stratum as
> > > separate from process_stratum.  I don't think it's appropriate - if we
> > > are debugging a core and process at the same time this isn't how it
> > > should work.  This ties in to all the make-targets-a-real-stack thing -
> > > I'm not entirely convinced on that score either.
> > > 
> > 
> > You can also try
> > 
> > ftp://ftp.linux-mips.org/pub/linux/mips/redhat/7.3/SRPMS/gdb-5.2.90-0.2.src.rpm
> > 
> > I tried to fix it and it seems to work for me.
> 
> FTP's still down.  Mind posting the patch?

That is a very old patch:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-03/msg00197.html


H.J.