From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-11377-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4294 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2002 05:07:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 4287 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2002 05:07:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout5-0.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.122)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2002 05:07:18 -0000
Received: from doctormoo (syr-24-24-16-193.twcny.rr.com [24.24.16.193])
	by mailout5-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/RoadRunner 1.20) with ESMTP id gB357GF18307
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 00:07:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18J5GS-0004C4-00
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 00:06:32 -0500
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:07:00 -0000
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB Speak: `inferior' rather than `target'?
Message-ID: <20021203050632.GA16061@doctormoo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2

Daniel wrote:
>I'm with Kevin - I don't like either inferior or target.  I'd suggest
>punting to debugee but it's too cumbersome.

"Debugee" is extremely clear.  Use it!

It doesn't translate well, of course, but so what?

--Nathanael