From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10212 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2002 02:15:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10203 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2002 02:15:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (66.30.22.225) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2002 02:15:22 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id C75621BF3A; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 21:15:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 18:15:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb and Dll Message-ID: <20021129021554.GB9712@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20021128030836.GC28113@redhat.com> <000401c296db$49e39110$fe78a8c0@SOL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000401c296db$49e39110$fe78a8c0@SOL> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00419.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 01:39:57PM +0100, Heiko Gerdau wrote: >> The GNATS id is 780 and the patch enclosed therein seems to work ok. > >Before I learn how to build it myself, could you send me the gdb.exe >containing those patches so that I can try that version? Actually, no, I'd rather not get into the business of sending private binaries. I see a tech support scenario developing in that situation. I build binaries for myself. I don't want to be in a situation of answering questions about my personal versions of gdb. Building a new version of gdb is not that hard. I urge you to try it.